Robert Putnam

By Ford School - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksZcOIguR_4, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=119793470
By Ford School 

Professor of political science at Harvard University, Robert Putnam was born in 1941. Although he did not come up with the idea of social capital, it was thanks to his work that it became widely accepted and began to influence several professions, including that of social work. Social scientists like Durkheim, Bourdieu, and Coleman employed the idea before Putnam. Putnam's 1995 article Bowling Alone introduced social capital outside of the sociology field. A few years later, in 2000, his book with the same title helped the idea gain enormous popularity.

Putnam developed three arguments in both his article as well as his book .

Putnam offered three arguments in both his article and book. He begins by introducing the idea of social capital as a crucial component of our society's quality. Social networks, societal engagement, and trust all play a part in it. For an economy to develop, social capital is essential. Contrary to conventional wisdom, social well-being really serves as the foundation for economic progress.

An further distinction is made: linking social capital entails engagement in society, bridging social capital entails having social contacts across group boundaries, such as between ethnic groups. Bonding social capital means belonging to a group and having social relationships. According to research, social capital is dispersed in society inequitably just like economic wealth. Particularly when it comes to bridging social capital, marginalized groups appear to have poor social capital.

Putnam subsequently argues that social capital is important

Putnam continues by asserting that social capital is crucial for a variety of reasons, including its impact on public safety, improved health, and higher levels of (informal) care. He concludes by outlining a wide range of phenomena that show social capital has been declining for many years. This includes things like the decline in the number of people who belong to trade unions or churches, the drop in election turnout, and the rise in the number of people who prefer to play sports alone rather than with a team. Hence the title of the book and the essay as well. Bowling's individualization serves as a metaphor for a broader individualization process. Concern over this social capital loss should lead to investments in social capital renewal. In a more recent book, Better Together, Putnam details how this can be done and is done.

Similar to other fields, social work has been invaded by the idea of social capital, which has rekindled interest in social networks and their impact on social support and quality of life for both individuals and communities. One factor is, for instance, that building social capital through bonding is important for survival but wonderful for advancement. In other words, new social relationships with different groups are desired above contacts with people or neighborhoods that share many characteristics in order to better the position of a person or neighborhood. Social progress and social capital appear to be mutually exclusive. The idea also meshes well with the person-in-environment approach and the ecological tradition in social work.


Comments

Thank You

Contact Form

Send