Culture: Characteristics, Theories and Attribute
CHARACTERISTICS OF CULTURE
Culture
is something which is relative because it cannot usually be strictly compared
as well as contrasted with other cultures, but even there is every scope for
anyone to say that one culture is better than other.
Culture
has its own characteristic. Some of these include:
1.
It
is not that innate and cultural traits can be acquired through socialisation
and habits. In other words, culture is learnt, it does not come of its own.
2.
When
we talk of culture we do not talk of culture of any individual. It is something
collection. It includes the expectations of the group as a whole. It is a
social product. In the words of Walter Paul, culture is the totality of group
ways, thought and action duly accepted and followed by a group of people”.
3.
It
is rightly said that what is included in culture is not all attainable. It is
always idealised and efforts are made to achieve these ideals. It reflects
ideal norm, behaviour of a group.
4.
Then
another characteristic of culture is that it has always links with the past. It
is past which is given to the future in the form of customs, traditions etc.
5.
Each
group has certain common ends which are met by the culture. It thus meets
ethical and social needs of the group as a whole.
6.
Various
parts of the culture are closely linked and integrated with each other. Culture
is thus not a disintegrated whole. Not only this but any element which gets
introduced and accepted by the culture also gets integrated.
7.
Culture
is usually passed on with the help of language.
5.4 THEORIES OF CULTURE
There
are basically two theories of culture which are the theory of culture patterns
and the theory of social structure.
1. Pattern
Theory: significant
contributions have been made by Kroedber and Kluckhom who believed that
“culture consists of patterns, explicit and implicit, of and for behaviour
acquired and transmitted by symbols, constituting the distinctive achievement
of human groups, including their embodiments in artifacts: The essential core
of culture consists of traditional ideas and their attached values; culture
systems may, on the one hand, be considered as products of action, on the other
hand, as conditioning elements of further action”. The totality of human
culture also contains an element of patterning that provides the general
framework for individual cultures.
Pattern
theory assumes that culture is created by individuals and groups and interacts
with them as well as with the environment. According to Kroeber, culture is an
intervening variable between human ‘organism’ and ‘environment’.
2. Social
Structure as a Theory of Culture: The
theory of social culture was first developed by Radcliffe- Brown who defined social structure “as a network or
systems of social relations. It is assumed that each structural system is a
functional unity in which all the components contribute in a harmonious way to
its existence and continuity. Radcliffe-Brown’s theory of social structure is
universal.
There
is a striking formal parallelism between the theory of culture patterns and the
theory of social structure. Both are holistic theories in the sense that they
try to cover all aspects of society and culture and each intends to apply that
framework to societies and cultures of any kind from small primitive societies
to complex civilization.
The
difference between the two theories is to be found in the different ways “they
connect culture and social structure within explanatory system”. According to pattern analysis, kinship system is
terminological system which expresses a system of classification. The
relation of a kinship system, so-defined, to social institutions and other
aspects of culture is the relation of one kind of culture pattern to others and
varies with the history and mutual association of the patterns.
In
the structural analysis, a kinship system
is a social system which includes a network of social relations as expressed in
customary modes of behaviour, feelings and thoughts. The interrelation within
the system is one of functional interdependence among the parts.
Neither
theory attempts to explain the nature of cultural or structural systems in
terms of linear causality.
Conclusion: we can summarize the major
conclusions of the analysis in a series of brief propositions:
(1)
Tylor’s
omnibus conception of culture is still the basis of most modern anthropological
theories of culture.
(2)
Two
theories of culture which dominated from 1900 to 1950 are the process-pattern
theory derived from Boas and best represented by Kroeber and structural
functional theory derived from Malinowski and Radcliff-Brown.
(3)
While
the process-pattern theory takes the concept of culture pattern as basic and
the structural theory takes social structure as basic, both theories cover the
full range of Tylor’s culture concept.
(4)
Each
theory is holistic and universal, each seeks to explain all aspects of culture
within a single theoretical framework and each intends to apply that frame work
to societies and cultures of any kind, from small primitive societies to
complex civilizations.
(5)
The
difference between the two basic theories cannot be derived from the
complementary character of the two basic concepts—culture pattern and social
structure since each theory accepts this as complementary but deals with it in
a different way.
(6)
The
difference between the two theories is to be found in the different ways they
cannot culture and social structure within explanatory systems.
(7)
The
precise nature of these explanatory systems may be inferred from the
paradigmatic model of the analysis of kinship system which expresses a system
of classification and an underlying unconscious logic.
(8) In the structural analysis, a kinship system is a social system with a network of social relations, as expressed in customary modes of behaviours. The interrelation within the system is one of the functional interdependence among the parts.
These different analysis of kinship systems are both example for cultural and structural analysis of all kinds and, hence, for two general theories of culture.
Neither theory attempts to explain the nature of cultural or structural systems in terms of linear causality. Each regards such systems as a outcome of the multiple influence of biology, psychology and natural environment, as well as of historic processes and of the creative human response to these ‘given’.
5.5 ATTRIBUTE OF CULTURE
Sociologists
and anthropologists tried by comparative study to arrive at some
generalizations as regards some attributes of culture.
ETHOS AND EIDOS
ASPECT OF CULTURE
Kroebar talked about two aspects of
culture, which he calls eidos and ethos. Eidos
is the formal appearance of a culture derived from its constituents,
whereas Ethos is the core value of
culture.
Contrasted
with the aggregate of constituents is ethos, the disposition of a culture which
determines its quality, its main themes and interests.
A
well-known Athropologist Baleson also says that each culture can be said to
have two aspects-
·
Consisting
of the total emotional emphasis of a culture, called Ethos.
·
Consisting
of the emphasis resulting from the cognitive processes operative within a culture,
called Eidos.
EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT ASPECTS
Klukhon talked about two aspects of
culture, explicit and implicit. He says that not everything in a people’s life
may be yielded to us and added to our knowledge merely through sensory
observation. Such regularities as may be perceived with the aid of the eye and
the ear are explicit items of a culture. There may be other items which would
be perceived by us only after being specially trained for looking for all that
is not obvious, the motivations and impulse underlying human action of which
the actors themselves may not be conscious. These would be the implicit items
of a culture. A total and representative study of a people’s way of life must
include both explicit as well as implicit items.
CULTURAL DETERMINISM
According
to culture determinists society itself is the product of culture. From the
viewpoint of Taylor culture was acquired by man as a member of society, but the
cultural determinists do not believe in such a social matrix of culture.
According to them, culture is the matrix of everything else, and is itself
governed by its own laws of growth and operation.
Leslie White in the main spokes man for
culture determinism, a viewpoint which, it may be said, suffers from the
culturalistic fallacy, of regarding culture as the essence and the self-moved
of human life. Human beings are equally the creators of culture as they are its
creatures and carriers.
CULTURE VIS-A-VIS
THE INDIVIDUAL
According
to Linton “The majority of people,
who are of the conforming type, culture plays the role of guide”. It lays down
norms of behaviour and provides the mechanisms which secure for an individual
his personal and social survival. Without culture man would have never
survived. It frees him from biological determinism.
Culture
is man’s guide, it liberates as well as enslaves him as all guide do. But for
the nonconforming few, called mystics by
Bergson and ‘the creative minority’ by Toynbee.’ Culture is the framework
within which to try their new ideas. They do not seek to destroy; their
non-conformity is not negative but constructive; they seek to change culture.
OVERTAND COVERT
ASPECTS OF CULTURE
Gilter has talked about two aspects of
culture-overt and covert. The external characteristics of culture is called
overt aspect of culture whereas the internal characteristics of culture is
called covert aspect of culture.
CULTURAL TERMS AND THEIR
PROPOUNDERS |
|
·
Cultural
lag- Ogburn ·
Cultural
trait- Wisler ·
Cultural
area- Wisler ·
Cultural
focus- Herskowitze ·
Marginal
cultural- Krober, Boas ·
Cultural
pattern- Ruth Bendict ·
Cultural
ecology- Julian Steward ·
Cultural
of poverty- O. Lewis ·
Cultural
ambivalence- Maclver and Page ·
Technological
restraint- Maclver and Page |
·
Cultural
materialism- Marvin Harris ·
Cultural
Complex- Wisler ·
Marginal
area- Wisler ·
Cultural
Relativism- Herskowitze ·
Marginal
man- Stewoquist ·
Cultural
Themes- Morris Opler ·
Cultural
Reproduction- P. Bourdieu ·
Cultural
Conflict- Maclver and Page ·
Technological
Lag- Maclver and Page ·
Ethnocentrism-
Sumner. |
Comments