Challenges and Limitations of Qualitative Research
Qualitative research – that is, research which focuses, not on numbers, but on the meaning of
phenomena and processes - is not really a new concept or methodology. However, it has come into a
spotlight recently, and there exists a lot of confusion about it. That is because qualitative research, by
its very nature, is situated in the context which offers many ways in which its findings can be
understood. The history of qualitative methodology throws light on how these meanings have
emerged and have led to different types of qualitative research. Second, the language of qualitative
research is markedly different from that of its older sibling, quantitative research. As more and more
qualitative research studies are conducted in social sciences and applied social sciences, both – the
challenges faced by qualitative researchers and limitations have surfaced, as have the benefits and
advantages of qualitative research. This module covers these aspects of qualitative research methods –
types, challenges and limitations.
The Concept of Qualitative Research
Qualitative research, as a field, began out of the need to understand the ‘other’ (Vidich & Lyman,
2000 as cited in Denzin & Lincoln, 2005). It was an interpretive, naturalistic approach to
understanding the world.
Qualitative researchers attempt to study a phenomenon or process in its natural setting and attempt to
make sense of or interpret it in terms of the meanings people bring to them (Denzin & Lincoln, 2005).
For this, they require to used different innovative field-based methods of data collection.
Thus, qualitative research came to be recognized as a methodology that uses a combination of
multiple methods based on multiple perspectives trying to capture the rigour, breadth, complexity,
richness and depth of lived realities of the participants (Flick, 2002 cited in Denzin & Lincoln,
2005).The meaning of qualitative research evolved through the phases or moments in its history over
a period spanning more than two centuries.
A Brief History of Qualitative Research Qualitative Research began with early ethnographic studies in the 17th century. These studies gained
visibility, and ethnography as a research design gained traction in the early 19th and 20th
studies of people in colonized countries by foreigners (Denzin & Lincoln, 2005). For instance, think
of Margaret Mead’s writings about the life and cultural practices of societies in Samoa and New
It was during this era that positivism – the research methodology emphasizing objectivity and
measurements – was challenged increasingly. Colonizing nations strived to make sense of the strange
and foreign worlds and this required ‘getting into their shoes’ or ‘experiencing or observing life as it
exists in a culture or a society’ (Denzin & Lincoln, 2005). Social Sciences Researchers started to
apply Interpretivism – a research paradigm that looks for culturally derived and historically
situated interpretations of the social life-world (ibid)
In sociology, qualitative method of enquiry was made popular by the work of the ‘Chicago School’ in
the 1920s and 30s. The anthropological studies conducted by Boas, Mead, Bendict, Bateson, EvansPritchard, Radcliffe-Brown and Malinowski created space for the qualitative research as an alternative
way of conducting enquiry (ibid).
Emergence of qualitative research methodology as an alternative scientific method of enquiry was not
without challenges, however. Denzin and Lincoln (2005) highlight eight moments of qualitative
research history starting from this phase titled ‘the Traditional Period’ till the eighth moment, the
present and future (since 2005). During this whole journey, qualitative research was challenged to
create a space as a ‘scientific enquiry’ especially because of its subjective, qualitative focus. Even
today, though the debate concerning qualitative research methods as a bonafide means to generate
knowledge has dwindled (Manning, 1999); it continues to face the challenge of balancing contextual
multiplicity, uniqueness of individual experiences and validity and trustworthiness of the data
(Denzin& Lincoln, 2005)
Definitions of qualitative research methodology
The term qualitative captures such a broad umbrella of research methods that it is difficult to fit all in
a single definition; however, one could attempt to define qualitative research highlighting its salient
features that sets it apart from inferential and quantitative research methodology.
Denzin and Lincoln (1994) define qualitative research as a methodology which is ‘multi-method in
focus, involving an interpretive, naturalist approach to its subject matter.’ The 'multi-method in focus'
implies a combination of multiple methods, empirical materials and perspectives (ibid). Qualitative
research is an inquiry process of understanding a social or human problem, based on building a
complex, holistic picture, formed with words, reporting detailed views of informants and conducted in
a natural setting. (Sogurno, 2001). Gay and Airasian (2000) propose that qualitative research is a
‘collection of extensive data on many variables over an extended period of time, in a naturalistic
setting, in order to gain insights not possible using other types of research.
Characteristics of Qualitative Research
Qualitative research has some distinct characteristics (Denzin & Lincoln, 1994; Flick et al, 2004;
Qualitative research is inductive in nature. This means that the research process starts in the
field and the data collected leads to theory development. In contrast, most quantitative
research begins with some apriori theory, and some quantitative research takes place within a
Qualitative research has a strong orientation to everyday life and events. Its foundation is that
people’s interactions and behaviours should not be reduced to statistical equations.
Quantitative research is described as ‘reductionist’ because it deals with observations about
behaviour and processes as research variables. The individual is less important than the
finding about the group.
There is minimal manipulation of the research setting. Phenomena are studied as they occur
or as they are recalled - without any control by the researcher. In quantitative research, one of
the critical methods involves experimentation where there are 2 groups – the researcher
delivers some treatment or intervention to one group of people, and then compares their
responses to another group which does not receive the treatment. Another quantitative method
is the before-after design where a person’s reaction is compared before and after they receive
some treatment that the researcher may have decided they would receive.
In qualitative research, data are gathered by flexible, open-ended methods and the diversity of
participant responses is valued.
Qualitative research emphasizes interaction between the researcher and the researched in a
manner which reduces the distance between them. The term ‘researched’ is used to denote
this two-way relationship rather than ‘respondent’.
Qualitative research recognizes the inevitability of influences from the researcher’s personal
characteristics and alignments like philosophical orientation, personal history, gender, social
class, race and ethnicity. Quantitative research will term this as “bias” and will make every
attempt to cleanse the research study of this.
The answers that emerge are still always open to question because qualitative research
recognizes the ever-changing nature of human interactions and relationships.
Challenges and Limitations of Qualitative Research
Qualitative research emerged as a response to unwarranted extension of quantitative methods based
on numbers and experiments. Even today, one of the biggest challenges to qualitative research comes
from the proponents of ‘objectivity’ in research. Qualitative data is dismissed as ‘anecdotal’ and is
valued lesser than quantitative research by those who value objectivity and certainty (Morse, 2005).
Qualitative researchers respond to these challenges by arguing for a different set of criteria of
evaluation the worthiness of research. They propose that whereas in quantitative study one talks about
reliability and validity, in qualitative research one talks about trustworthiness of the data and the
research process. The purpose for which a qualitative research is undertaken is different from that for
which a quantitative research is initiated because both give different type of data and both have
limitations (Coates, 2004).
The limitations of qualitative research are:
Knowledge produced is note intended to be generalisable to other people or other settings
(i.e., findings might be unique to the relatively few people included in the research study).
It might have lower credibility with some administrators and authorities who commission
programmes and interventions.
It generally takes more time to collect the data compared to quantitative research.
Data analysis is often time consuming.
As the researcher is the ‘insider’ or closest to the insider, there is more risk of research
process and findings being influenced by the researcher’s personal biases and idiosyncrasies.
Whatever the limitations, for any research the foremost consideration should be that it is systematic
and rigorous. Qualitative Research Methodology also entails a systematic process of investigation,
contributes to a body of knowledge and links to the field or practice.
The dominant research paradigm for much of the twentieth century was positivism, but today,
especially in social sciences, qualitative research which is an alternative research paradigm is also
Qualitative research is a methodology which is ‘multi-method in focus, involving an interpretive,
naturalist approach to its subject matter. It is an inquiry process that builds a complex, holistic picture
of social interactions, behavior or phenomena under study.
Qualitative research is characterized by an inductive and iterative research process, minimal
manipulation of factors under study by the researcher, multiple data collection methods and in-depth
Qualitative research has both strengths as well as weaknesses. Some of the major strengths of
qualitative research are that it reduces gap between theory and practice, gives a holistic picture, it is
useful for exploring new concepts and areas and goes beyond obvious. However, some of the
challenges faced by the qualitative researcher are it is difficult to generalise, not useful to make
quantitative predictions and is time-consuming.
Atkinson, P. And Hammersley, M. (2007) Ethnography: Principles in Practice. (3rd ed.) New
Coates, V. (2004) ‘Qualitative Research: A Source of Evidence to Inform Nursing Practice?’
(Research Series). Journal of Diabetes Nursing 8 (9). pp. 329 – 334.
Denzin, N. K & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). "Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research."
In NK Denzin and YS Lincoln (Eds.)Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 1-17). Thousand
Oaks: Sage Publications.
Denzin, Norman K. and Lincoln, Yvonna, S. (Ed.) (2005) ‘The Sage Handbook of Qualitative
Research’ (3rd ed.), New Delhi: Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd.
Flick, U., Kardoff E., Steinke, I. (2004) A Companion to Qualitative Research. New Delhi: SAGE