Society and Culture: India's Cultural Plurality
Content
- Introduction
- Concept of Society
- Concept of Culture
- Relationship of Culture and Society
- Relationship of Culture, Society and Individual
- Plurality of Culture
- Summary
Introduction
Concept of Society
- Man has needs, which he chooses to meet or fulfil on his own; he can do so while still being a member of society or while still living in society. The way those demands are met is influenced by the patterns of expectations and behaviour that we refer to as culture. From one community to the next, there is a vast range of approaches to addressing human needs. This diversity distinguishes and distinguishes one society from others.
- Man requires the help of others from the very beginning, i.e., from birth. Initially, he is reliant on others to assist him with his social and physical development. His general development and growth are facilitated by organised social life. This is where the society's primary significance lies. Though society expands and fulfils this role throughout man's life, he requires it the most in his early years.
- Society supplies a man with understanding information and exposure to his surroundings and environment. Man learns to behave, act, respond, and play his required role for his environment and the society of which he is a member in society.
Concept of Culture
One of the best, and most acceptable, early definitions of culture was given by E.B. Tylor (1871) in his book “Primitive culture”, wherein he described culture as “that complex whole which includes knowledge, belief, art, morals, law, custom, and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man as a member of society”.
The definition implies that culture is not simple and it is not constituted by one or two parts. Rather it is a complicated one and is constituted by a great number of components of life which span, as stated in the definition, from knowledge to legislation to traditions. This also covers habits formed by man while living and interacting in society with other members. Though comprised by a huge number of elements, called features, culture has to be comprehended in entirety, the whole. All the qualities are so beautifully blended that each one gets almost merged into the other. Culture, when examined holistically, is unqerstood as a complicated whole. The following are some of the features of culture:
- Culture is a complicated entity in which all of its aspects and characteristics must be understood in connection to one another. In this way, they collectively make up a whole called culture, which is complicated in nature.
- Culture is learned: Human culture is neither instinctive, innate, or physiologically transmitted. It is made up of habits, or learned dispositions to react, that each individual has acquired via his or her unique life experiences after birth.
- Culture is instilled: All animals can learn, but only man appears to be capable of passing on his acquired habits and behaviour to his offspring to a substantial extent. A dog can be taught a variety of tricks, but they cannot be passed down to its puppies. Man, on the other hand, is capable of passing on all of his knowledge and behaviours to his descendants.
- Culture is social: Cultural habits are not simply instilled and transferred over time; they are all social, in the sense that they are shared by all human beings living in the society. The culture of a civilization is defined by the habits that its members share.
- Culture is commercial: The behaviours that make up a group's culture define desirable norms or patterns of behaviour.
- Culture serves biological and secondary demands: Culture always and necessarily satisfies biological and secondary needs. It also aids in the enjoyment of human interaction with the natural environment and fellow humans.
- Culture is adaptable: It evolves. The changing process appears to be adaptive, similar to evolution in the organic domain but on a different scale. Culture adapts over time to the physical environment as well as the biological and socio-psychological demands of the human organism. Borrowing and organisation help it adjust.
- Culture is integrative: During the adaptation process, all parts of culture tend to come together to form a coherent and integrated whole. Some anthropologists believe that culture is an integrated system in which the majority of its components are in perfect harmony with one another.
- Language as a cultural vehicle: All aspects of culture are passed down from generation to generation through language, whether verbal or written. Man cannot transmit civilization from one epoch to the next or from one location to another without the use of language. 1
- Culture is cumulative: One generation gains knowledge, skills, and other forms of culture from the previous one. The acquired culture is added to or modified, and then passed down to the following generation in a cumulative manner. This enables man to acquire information, talents, and other cultural features from the distant past and pass them on to future generations.
“Culture is the man made part of the environment” (Herskovits, MJ. 1955).
“The sum total of the knowledge, attitudes and habitual behaviour patterns shared and transmitted by the members of a particular society” (Linton, 1940).
“(All the) historically created designs for living, explicit and implicit, rational, irrational, and non-rational, which exist at any given time as potential guides for the behaviour of man” (Kluckhohn and Kelly, 1945).
Culture encompasses all aspects of existence, including tools, skills, ideas, values, and all aspects of life (Kroeber, 1948). All of these components, including arts and artefacts, as well as patterns of human behaviour acquired and transmitted, make up human groups' distinguishing achievement, including its manifestations in objects (Kroeber and Kluckhohn, 1952).
Culture is revealed to be more than a biological phenomenon. In a nutshell, culture refers to a man's mature behaviour gained from his peers through conscious learning or conditioning, as well as diverse skills, social and other organisations, beliefs, and predictable styles of conduct. As a result, man is the only "culture-building" animal.
As stated culture has two aspects :
- Material Culture: It covers any artefacts or objects built by man for his own use, such as houses, furniture, clothing, tools, and so on. It's the visible, touchable, and observable aspect. Material culture aspects can be purposefully developed, built, destroyed, recreated, and improved upon to meet man's needs and desires. Some products are designed to protect man from the environment, aid in his survival, and combat severe weather and unfriendly climate. Medicines, for example, are invented, discovered, and used to combat diseases, improve health, and increase quality of life. Some components of material culture, namely, ideational aspects of culture, are formed and built to meet the demands and needs originating from changes in non-material culture. When compared to non-material culture, material culture has a greater range of variations.
- Non-material Culture: It encompasses all parts of culture that aren't material or spiritual. Ellenwood defined culture as "all of man's material civilization, including tools, weapons, clothing, shelter, machines, and even industrial systems" on the one hand, and "all of man's non-material or spiritual civilization, including language, literature, art, religion, ritual, morality, law, and government on the other." The distinction between material and nonmaterial culture is made explicit in the term.
Relationship of Culture and Society
Herskovits its has made this clear when he observed that “a culture is the way of life of the people; while a society is an organised and interacting aggregate of individuals who follow a given way of life”. Further “a society is composed of people the way they behave is their culture”
We can start by looking at man's ideas, institutions, and physical artefacts. In reality, we're looking at man himself. As a result, it's impossible to distinguish between man as a social being and man as a cultural creation. The two characteristics are so intertwined that neither can be comprehended or explained without the other. Both society and culture, it might be stated, are not mutually exclusive. With society and culture, one must understand social reality.
Individual members of a society made up of individuals may die and be replaced by others. As a result, society has a structural component. Its structure and survival are determined by the birth, death, and replacement of members. Individual members, on the other hand, have little influence over culture. Individual members' births, deaths, and replacements have little impact on the culture. Culture belongs to the area of normative urder, whereas society belongs to the realm of social structure and organisation.
On the social level, there is a continuous process of interactive behaviour, whose persistent form of social relationship is referred to as social structure; on the cultural level, there are beliefs, values, norms, and other factors through which people define their world, express their feelings, and make judgments. As a result, cultUre is the fabric through which humans interpret their experiences, whereas social structure is the shape in which action takes. As a result, culture and social structure are two sides of the same coin.
S.F. Nadel (1951) has made a distinction between society and culture in this way:
“Society means the totality of social facts projected on to the dimensions of relationships and groupings; cultures, the same totality in the dimensions of action”. In this respect, some scholars have even raised the question “are not people -’ society - the reality rather than their way of life”. Some consider ways of life as the intangibles and as the inferences drawn from the behavior of people. Therefore, to study society is important for us because it essentially allows us to.understand’ how the . life lived by man in aggregates affects his behaviour.
Individual relationships evolve with age, strength, assumed responsibilities, and acquired status in all civilizations. In all societies, an individual's social existence begins with affiliation with a group. It is the group's cultural training that prepares an individual to live up to the group's or society's expectations. A man gains proficiency in his culture through his learning experience.
Many scholars have discussed why society is necessary for human beings. This necessity can be explained in terms of man's physical and mental makeup, as well as his cultural indoctrination.
Why should man live in society? Some of the reasons are explain :
A man's primary need in society is to fulfil and satisfy his biological and other requirements. However, in order to satisfy them, he uses cultural means, and culture therefore becomes a means to an end. Man can express his choices to satisfy his wants as a member of society, and the process of this satisfaction takes the form of cultural expressions. Man uses his cultural qualities to meet his needs for shelter and nourishment.
It is a reality that the infant is physically and intellectually helpless at the time of birth to face the environment and meet his needs. It takes a long time for him to mature and become self-sufficient. In the process of his upbringing, he requires the ongoing assistance of others. His entire growth and development is under the supervision of other members of society or members of his group. This is continued in the group's organised life. A youngster develops his personality through instilling values and standards during this process. He improves his abilities and prepares himself to confront the challenges of life.
He must live in society and live as a part of it in constant interaction with other members for the reasons stated above, in order to be self-reliant and competent to respond to the expectations others have of him.
Relationship of Culture, Society and Individual
Plurality of Culture
Summary
References
- Bottomore, T.B. (1975), Sociology, Blackie and Son (India) Ltd., New Delhi. Herskovits, M.l. (1969), Cultural Anthropology, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi.
- Keesing, Roger M. and Keesing, Felix M. (1968), New Perspectives in Cultural Anthropology. Rinehart and Winston, London.
- Kroeber, A.L. (1967) (Indian Ed.) Anthropology, Oxford IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi.
- Kroeber, A.L. and Clyde Kluckhohn, (1985) Culture, Vintage Books, New York. Majumdar, D.N and T.N. Madan, (1956), An Introduction to Social Anthropology, Asian Press, Bombay.
- Smelser, Neil l. (1993), Sociology, Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi.
Comments