Bonds of Unity in India

Contents

  1. Meaning of Unity
  2. Geo-political Unity
  3. The Institution of Pilgrimage
  4. Tradition of Accommodation
  5. Tradition of Interdependence

Meaning of Unity

Unity means integration. It is a socio-psychological condition. It means a feeling of oneness, a feeling of we-ness. It represents the ties that unite the members of a society. There is a difference between unity and uniformity. Uniformity presupposes similarity, unity does not. Thus, unity may or may not be based on uniformity. Unity can be born from unity. Durkheim calls this kind of unity a mechanical solidarity. We find this type of unity in tribal societies and in traditional societies. However, unity can also be based on differences. It is such a unity that Durkheim describes as organic solidarity. This type of unity characterizes modern societies.

Geo-political Unity

The first link of India's unity is found in its geopolitical integration. India is known for its geographical entity formed by the Himalayas in the north and the oceans on the other side. Politically, India is now a sovereign state. The same constitution and the same parliament govern all its parts. We share the same political culture, shaped by the norms of democracy, secularism and socialism. Although only recently recognized, India's geopolitical unity has always been visualized by our seers and leaders. Expressions of this awareness of India's geopolitical unity are found in the Rig Veda, Sanskrit literature, Edicts of Asoka, Buddhist monuments and various other sources. India's ideal of geopolitical unity is also reflected in the concepts of Bharatvarsha (the ancient native classical name of India), Chakravarti (emperor) and Ekchhatradhipatya (under one ruler).

The Institution of Pilgrimage

Another source of India's unity lies in the so-called temple culture, which is reflected in the network of shrines and sacred places. From Badrinath and Kedarnath in the north to Rameshwaram in the south, Jagannath Puri in the east to Dwaraka in the west, religious shrines and holy rivers are scattered far and wide across the country. Closely related to them is the ancient culture of pilgrimage, which has always taken people to different parts of the country and fostered a sense of geocultural unity in them. Pilgrimage is not only an expression of religious feeling, but also an expression of love for the motherland, a kind of cult of the fatherland. It has played an important role in promoting interaction and cultural affinity among people living in different parts of India. Pilgrimages can therefore rightly be considered as a mechanism of geo-cultural unity.

Tradition of Accommodation

Have you heard of the syncretic quality of Indian culture, its remarkable adaptability and tolerance? There is enough evidence for that. The first proof of this is the resilient nature of Hinduism, India's majority religion. It is well known that Hinduism is not a homogeneous religion, a religion with a god, a book and a temple. In fact, it can best be described as a federation of denominations. Polytheistic in nature (with multiple deities), it goes so far as to accommodate village-level deities and tribal religions.

For the same reason, sociologists have distinguished two major forms of Hinduism: Sanskrit and folk. Sanskrit is what is found in texts (religious books like Vedas, etc.) and popular is what is found in the real life situation of the masses. Robert Redfield has called these two forms the great tradition of the Ramayana and the Mahabharata and the lesser tradition of village god worship. And everything passes for Hinduism. This shows that Hinduism was an open religion, a receptive and absorbing religion, an inclusive religion. He is recognized for his quality of openness and adaptability.

Another proof of this lies in his apathy for conversion. Hinduism is not a religion that proselytizes for unity and diversity. That is, it does not seek converts. Nor has it normally resisted other religions in seeking converts within it. This quality of welcome and tolerance paved the way for the coexistence of different religions in India. Mechanisms for the coexistence of people of different beliefs have existed here for a long time. Take the case of Hindu-Muslim friendship, for example. Hindus and Muslims have always attended each other's functions, celebrations and festivals. How did you do that? They did this by devising the mechanism of providing each other with a separate hearth and set of vessels to respect each other's religious sensibilities. This always facilitated visits and the sharing of each other's joys and sorrows. They also did this by showing respect to each other's holy and holy men. Thus, both Hindus and Muslims mutually paid homage to saints and pirs. And this also applies to the coexistence of other religious groups such as Sikhs, Jains, Christians, etc.

Tradition of Interdependence

We have had a remarkable tradition of interdependence that has kept us together through the ages. One manifestation of it is found in the form of the Jajmani system, i.e. a system of functional interdependence of castes. The term "jajman" generally refers to the patron or recipient of specialized services. Relationships have traditionally been between a family producing food and the families who supported it with goods and services. These were called jajmani relationships. Jajmani relationships were important in village life as they involved ritual affairs, social support as well as economic exchange. The entire local social order (people and their values) was involved in these jajmani relationships. A patron had Jajmani ties to members of a high caste (such as a Brahmin priest whom he needed for rituals). He also needed the services of specialists from the lower Jati to perform the necessary tasks such as washing dirty clothes, cutting hair, cleaning rooms and toilets, giving birth to the child, etc. Those bound in these interdependencies were expected and largely supportive of each other with qualities of willing assistance generally expected of relatives.

Jajmani relationships usually involve multiple types of payments and obligations as well as multiple functions. We will also discuss the jajmani system in the next unit on rural social structure. Suffice it to note here that no caste was self-sufficient. At least he depended on other toilets for many things. In a sense, each caste was a functional group in that it provided some service to other caste groups. The Jajmani system is the mechanism that formalized and regulated this functional interdependence.

Moreover, castes transcend the boundaries of religious communities. We have already mentioned that caste is found in all religious communities in India. In its current practice, the institution of Jajmani thus ensures links between people of different religious groups. For example, a Hindu may rely on a Muslim washerman to wash his clothes. Similarly, a Muslim may depend on a Hindu tailor to sew his clothes, and vice versa. Efforts have been made from time to time by sensitive and sensible leaders of the two communities to synthesize Hindu and Muslim traditions in order to bring the two great communities closer together. Akbar, for example, founded a new religion, Din-e-Ilahi, which combined the best of both religions.

The contributions of Kabir, Eknath, Guru Nanak and more recently Mahatma Gandhi are well known in this regard. Likewise, in the field of art and architecture, we find such a happy mixture of Hindu and Muslim styles. What is this if not proof of mutual appreciation for each other's culture? In keeping with these traditional unity bonds, the Indian state in the post-independence era has rightly opted for a composite culture model of national unity rather than a unified culture model.

The composite culture model maintains and enhances the plurality of cultures within the framework of an integrated nation. Hence the importance of our choice of the standard of secularism, which includes equal respect for all religions, as our national integration policy. The previous account of India's unity should not be interpreted as a statement that we have always had smooth sailing in the field of national unity, with no instances of caste, community or language uprisings. Nor should divisive and separatist tendencies be understood to have been completely absent. From time to time there were riots, sometimes serious riots. For example, who can forget the communal riots on Partition Day, the language riots in Tamil Nadu to protest the imposition of Hindi, the 1980s Gujarat riots between scheduled and unscheduled castes, and the 2002 communal riots ? The redeeming feature, however, is that the bonds of unity have always emerged stronger than the forces of disintegration.

Further Reading

  • Betteille, A. 2000. The Chronicles of Our Time. Penguin Books India: New Delhi 
  • Deshpandae, Satish 2003. Contemporary India: A Sociological View. Viking: New Delhi 
  • Mukerjee, Radha Kumud 1954. The Fundamental Unity of India. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan: Bombay, pp. 17-22 
  • Risley, H.H. 1969, The People of India (first print in 1915). Orient Books: Delhi 
  • Srinivas, M.N. 1969. Social Structure. Publications Division, Government of India: New Delhi

Comments

Thank You