Who Identify Elitist and Popular Social Action?

Social action is a process of collective mobilization to bring about social change. It can be initiated and carried out by individuals, groups, or organizations. There are two main models of social action: elitist social action and popular social action.

Elitist social action is initiated and conducted by the elite for the benefit of the masses. In this model of social action, the general public or target group is not involved. The elite may use their power and influence to bring about change, or they may work through social institutions such as the government or the media.

Popular social action is initiated and conducted by the masses themselves. In this model of social action, the people are aware of their problems and are willing to take action to address them. They may use a variety of methods to bring about change, such as protests, strikes, or boycotts.

The two models of social action have different strengths and weaknesses. Elitist social action can be more effective in bringing about immediate change, but it may not be sustainable in the long term. Popular social action can be more difficult to achieve, but it is more likely to be sustainable because it is based on the participation of the people themselves.

Who defines elitist and popular social action?

The two models of social action were identified by social scientist Luiz Britto in his 1984 book, Social Action for Liberation. Britto argued that the two models represent different approaches to social change and that each has its own strengths and weaknesses.

Elitist social action can be effective in bringing about rapid change, but it can also be paternalistic and disempowering. Popular social action can be more difficult to achieve, but it can also be more sustainable and empowering.

The choice of which model to use depends on the specific context. In some cases, elitist social action may be the best option, such as when the masses are too oppressed or marginalized to initiate their own action. In other cases, popular social action may be the best option, such as when the masses are already organized and motivated.

There are a number of different people who can identify elitist and popular social action. These include:

  • Social scientists who study social movements and social change
  • Policymakers who are responsible for developing and implementing social policies
  • Community organizers who work with grassroots organizations
  • Journalists who report on social issues

The importance of identifying elitist and popular social action

Identifying elitist and popular social action is important for a number of reasons. First, it can help us understand the different ways in which social change can be brought about. Second, it can help us identify the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches to social change. Third, it can help us develop more effective strategies for bringing about social change.

Comments

Thank You